Am Law 200 Data Reveals a Structural Gap in Marketing & Business Development

Why current operating models fall short of growth expectations—and how firms can redesign for measurable impact.

A new generation of law firm leaders is facing heightened competition and operational pressures, while pursuing ambitious growth agendas. In this context, marketing and BD structure and performance have become Executive Team—and increasingly Board-level—discussions.

Drawing on 80,000 hours of time-tracking dataorganizational analysesand surveys, and executive interviews with more than 2,800 Am Law 200 partners and firm leaders, this report exposes a structural disconnect 

Most Marketing and BD (MBD) teams are working at full capacityjust not in ways that deliver consistent, firm growth impact 

This is not a hiring or capability issue. It is a structural one. 

The data shows that today’s MBD teams are still being run on legacy operating models built for a very different era of legal growth.  

Why This Report Matters Now

Law firm leaders are asking more of Marketing and Business Development than ever before: 

  • Measurable revenue impact 
  • Strategic insight, not just execution 
  • Scalable growth support across practices and markets 

Yet most MBD functions are still organized around concierge-style service delivery, not revenue enablement. 

Key Research Findings

Based on empirical data across the Am Law 200, the findings underscore the urgency for law firm leaders to modernize their Marketing and BD (MBD) structure and operating systems. Key highlights:

  • Partner demand is concentrated; prioritization is informal.
    A small subset of attorneys (5%) drives a disproportionate share (44%) of attorney-facing MBD time, with limited governance or structured intake—making responsiveness the default operating system.
  • Time investment and revenue impact are weakly aligned.
    A significant portion (nearly 85%) of MBD effort—at all levels—sits outside direct or high-value revenue influence, obscuring ROI and weakening leadership confidence.
  • Senior capacity is materially underleveraged.
    Directors and senior leaders spend disproportionate time (24%) on low-value or enabling work, limiting their ability to influence growth, clients, and market positioning.
  • Strategic capabilities lag where they matter most to firm leaders and partners.  
    Market intelligence, forward-looking insight, and proactive growth planning show the largest gaps between importance and performance (27%)

Access The Full White Paper

Fill out the form below and access the complete report to explore the data and leadership insights shaping the next generation of law firm growth models.

Download Your Copy of Calibrate's Latest White Paper

Connect with Us

Related Insights

Canadian Law Firms Pay Top Dollar for Business Development Leaders

The balance of power inside Canada’s law firms is shifting. Business development leaders have become the new architects of firm...

Law Firm Marketing/BD Department Size Study 2024

Calibrate’s latest study, conducted in partnership with our UK affiliate Totum, measures the sizes of Marketing/BD Departments in both North...

The State of Upskilling and Reskilling in Law Firms

We recently surveyed law firm business services professionals to better understand how they feel about their firm’s commitment to providing...